Skip to main content

OG&E and the Corporation Commission Aren’t Doing Their Jobs


At the time of this writing, it’s been a full week since there was power at my home. I live within OG&E’s electrical grid, so when it comes to being without power this past week, I’m nothing special. Many of OG&E’s customers had no power for days, and some will have no power for well over a week. By the time power is restored to everyone in their service area, OG&E’s own estimate is that it will have taken ten full days to repair all the damage from Oklahoma’s latest ice storm.


Ice storms are bears, no doubt about it. They are very hard on trees, and if the roads ice over, they are very hard on cars. But roads, for the most part, were not an issue during Oklahoma’s “Icemageddon” of 2020. The problem was the extra weight of the ice on trees, wires and poles. And what we discovered was that Oklahoma’s electric power grid, once again, was not up to the challenge.


Fact is, Oklahoma’s power grid isn’t up to much of Oklahoma’s weather. Every time the electricity goes out, which is far too often, we hear the same old thing. “The wind was hard;” “that was a lot of ice;” “a lot of rain fell, and there was lightning.” Then there are the familiar deflections: “Our crews are working overtime;” “Our crews are working in harsh conditions day and night;” and “We’ve hired crews from out-of-state and are working tirelessly.” No doubt, the deflections are true, and the linemen working to restore power deserve respect, but should it be necessary to put them at such risk? Do poles HAVE to snap in such high numbers?


I grew up in North Texas. I’ve lived in Oklahoma almost six years. Something I’ve noticed about the weather in this part of the country is that it’s extreme. Warm, clear days turn into thunderstorms so thick that the streetlights come on as the sky turns dark as night in the middle of the day. Summer-like weather in the morning can turn into a hard freeze by nightfall. Rain can come in buckets; hail shatters windshields; wind blows hard and gusty; lightning flashes like paparazzi at the Oscars; and ice seems to come out of nowhere.


Wind, snow, rain, ice, and lightning are ubiquitous in Oklahoma, but they always seem to be a surprise for OG&E and its grid.


During my first year in Oklahoma, there was an ice storm. The electricity failed for at least two days, long enough that we had to buy a generator to keep refrigerated food from spoiling.


A year or so later, there was a storm in Muskogee with some hard wind – not a tornado, mind you – just hard wind. We had a lightning strike that same night that popped a breaker on the high wire near my house. We were without power for four days in summer when the fix would have taken five minutes to accomplish, but every available body was in Muskogee replacing poles.


And now we have 2020. Everybody is talking about trees toppling and breaking, crashing the electric wires. No doubt, that’s true; I’ve seen the pictures. Nobody can be expected to anticipate trees uprooting due to ice. But, some of the pictures of broken electrical poles flat on the ground don’t show a tree anywhere close.


The reason I and my neighbors are constantly dumping gas into generators for extended periods every couple of years is not so much because of the weather, which is remarkably predictable in that we know the wind will blow hard and there will be storms, sometimes of the ice variety. Instead, it’s more about rotten electrical poles, and maybe untrimmed trees. OG&E and other electric providers simply are not maintaining their grids.


Admittedly, I’ve never been an electric pole inspector, but old, rotten poles are not that hard to spot. I once tried to complain about poles that had snapped some miles from my house in an effort to find out if the Corporation Commission was paying any attention to the problem. I’d passed by the poles that had broken and noticed they were in bad shape for years before. What I got for my trouble in calling the Corporation Commission was a career bureaucrat only interested in whether repairs were made, and not one bit interested in preventing problems in the first place.


OG&E is a private, for-profit company with a monopoly granted by government to provide electricity within a specific territory. Because it’s a monopoly, it is heavily regulated by the Corporation Commission, which is supposed to prevent what monopolies do – charge a high price for low-quality service. Oklahoma has the lowest electricity rates in the nation, and OG&E’s service is decent enough during good weather. Where OG&E falls woefully short, and the Corporation Commission deserves to carry at least some of the blame, is during less-than-ideal weather conditions, obviously because the grid is not properly maintained. OG&E, from what I’ve seen, seems to only replace poles after sending some of its customers back to the 19th century when the poles break.


OG&E is asking for the Corporation Commission to increase the rates it charges to customers in order to upgrade its grid. But while there is an argument for the upgrade OG&E wants to do, it doesn’t appear to be about replacing rotten poles with new ones. 


Before OG&E’s customers should have to pay higher rates, how about an investigation into OG&E and the Corporation Commission? Cindy Byrd has proven she’s pretty good at auditing private companies, like EPIC charter schools, which by the way, is NOT a monopoly. How about an audit of OG&E, which IS a monopoly that its customers have no choice but to patronize? Let’s find out how often they replace poles as part of general maintenance as opposed to only replacing them when they break. Let’s find out how much of a revolving door between the Corporation Commission’s staff and OG&E there is. Let’s find out the last time the Corporation Commission even asked OG&E about compromised reliability due to inadequate maintenance. Let’s find out the financial cost to small businesses and homeowners and crippling what is supposed to be a modern city from having lost power for a week, or more.


To put it bluntly, the Corporation Commissioners need to do their jobs, investigate the state-granted OG&E monopoly, and make sure Oklahoma’s electric rate payers get quality service, not just in the best weather conditions, but in inclement weather as well, even if it means a modest rate increase. But if the Corporation Commission won’t do their jobs, let’s change the constitution so that they experience some real oversight from the legislature.


Byron Schlomach is Director of the 1889 Institute and can be reached at bschlomach@1889institute.org.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the official position of 1889 Institute.

Popular posts from this blog

The Problem of Diffuse Costs and Concentrated Benefits

Do you ever find yourself observing a seemingly illogical government program , spending decision, or other strange practice and ask “how is it that no one has fixed that?” If you are like me, you encounter this phenomenon regularly. This often takes the form of a curious headline (Save Federal Funding for the Cowboy Poets!) that most people see and can’t believe is real. I would like to suggest that this phenomenon often results from the problem of diffuse costs and concentrated benefits. To understand this concept, consider a hypothetical law that assessed a $1 tax on everyone in the United States with the proceeds to be given to one individual for unrestricted use as he sees fit. The people harmed by such a law—the individual taxpayers—will not be very motivated to spend the time and effort to convince Congress to change the law. They might resent the dollar taken from them for a silly cause they don’t support, but the lost dollar isn’t worth the trouble of doing something about i...

If Data Is Supposed to Be Our Guide, the Great Coronavirus Shutdown of 2020 Should End

According to the most widely cited model projecting the course of the coronavirus outbreak, today is supposed to be Oklahoma’s peak in daily deaths. Now is a good time to go back to the beginning of the Great Coronavirus Shutdown of 2020, review the goal of our policy, and assess our current status. If our policy should be “data-driven,” as we are constantly told, then let’s actually look at the data and determine our next policy steps accordingly. Spoiler alert: according to the terms set out by those advocating for the shutdown policy, the policy’s continuance is no longer justified. The stated goal of the shutdown policy was to “flatten the curve” so as to prevent hospitals from becoming overwhelmed with COVID patients. The fear was that the virus would spread so fast that at its peak, the number of cases would exceed the overall capacity of the healthcare system. If that peak could be stretched out over a longer period of time, lives would be saved. This concept was il...

Even If Pandemic Models Were Right, Were Covid Lockdowns Wrong?

1889 has been quite critical of pandemic modeling that government officials have relied on for their Covid-19 response. We have also criticized shutdown orders in light of flaws in the models. But let’s assume for a moment that the worst predictions really would have come true if nothing was done. Even in those worst case scenarios, it’s fair to ask if our governments did the right thing. Were involuntary shutdowns justified, or would people have found a way to both limit the contagion and maintain some level of productivity? Was putting healthy citizens under house arrest acceptable even if they were willing to risk infection?   While large groups of people are often compared to herd animals, we are not sheep. We don’t behave like animals. We can, have, and will step up when our communities are in danger. When government and journalists give incomplete or false information, people will act irrationally. Depending on the situation, some will blindly follow the first aut...

Why Does Oklahoma License Polygraph Examiners?

Should polygraph examiners be licensed? In Oklahoma, a license is required to work as a polygraph examiner (a professional who applies lie-detector tests), and it is not at all obvious why. Generally, an occupation is licensed if it is obviously in the public’s interest to prevent potential bad actors from practicing. So, for example, it is argued that doctors must be licensed because, otherwise, some idiot might open a hospital in his garage and really hurt someone. And it is argued that accountants must be licensed because, otherwise, some college-dropout might offer to do accounting for an unsuspecting mom-and-pop shop, tell them their numbers look great (when, in fact, they don’t), and cause them to go bankrupt. In short, occupational licensing is supposed to either (1) prevent real, tangible harm, or (2) assure customers that their service-provider is trustworthy. However, interestingly, licensing polygraph examiners does not accomplish either of those goals because polygraph e...