Skip to main content

A Blunt Cry for Covid Dread’s End


Allowing an admittedly adverse ailment to be inaccurately advertised as an apocalyptic abomination able to annihilate all is aggravating, annoying, and abhorrent. An accurate assessment advises any and all to avoid alarmism and act appropriately. Anxieties are anticipated, but authentic appraisal admits an alternative: any of advanced age or anemic autoimmunity are advised to avert ailment by avoiding acquaintances and afflicted areas. Adults, adolescents, and any of an early age are able to get back to business.

Bodies are besieged and beset by baseless bombast. Broadcasters blithely belch baloney. Boorish bullies berate and belittle. Bureaucrats ban beneficial business. Busybodies blinded by bad bulletins belittle benign behaviors. But bravery and boldness bolster benevolence. By bringing back businesses, cities can commence circulation of currency and cooperative commerce. 

Concededly, Covid causes casualties. However, careful consideration confirms: car crashes cruelly cause catastrophe, cigarettes cause cancer, and cardiac crisis claims more lives than any contrary cause. Curiously, coupes and carriages continue to cruise, cigar consumption carries on, and corpulent consumers chew copious counts of cholesterol. Consequently, caution is called for, but we can't condone crippling cowardice. Craven conduct is a cancer. Courage is the cure.

Doubtless destiny dictates death for all, but deaths from this disease are dwindling. Digging deep into darkened dens to delay dying declares defeat. Defeatism does durable damage. Driving out debilitating dread is our duty. Determination is desirable. Daring is distinguished.

Ducking destiny is doubtful. Death is defeated, but not yet destroyed. Do deeds. Dream dreams. Dance. Discover. Develop. Defy danger. Delight in the days you do have.

Emergency edicts were erroneous. Extending them was egregious. Encourage - without enforcing extra enactments - the elderly and enfeebled to eliminate their exposure. Everyone is entitled to evaluate exposure, estimate enrichment, and employ expedient efforts to effectuate an equilibrium of risk and reward. So enable the economy. Educate. Empower employers and employees to emerge from exile and engage in exchange. Embrace economic endeavors. Every employee is essential.

Even excellent elected executives floundered, and failed to fulfill fiduciary functions, fearing figurative floggings from feckless fear-mongers for not forcing fearless figures to find foxholes for the foreseeable future.

Fairness favors flexibility: folks who feasibly fear fatality can’t be faulted for fortifying. Fleeing fellowship is fruitful for families who feature fragile folks. But forcing fledglings and formidable fellows to fritter away fruitful functions for flimsy freebies is foul play.

Generally, getting gated in without guests gives way to gloom and gluttony. Gainful goings-on generate glee and gladness. Responsibility gives life meaning, so get going.

High-risk humans hardly have a choice: habitation at home is healthful. But healthy homo-sapiens should hurriedly hop headlong towards happening hotspots. Herd immunity will help hasten normal habits. Then high-risk humans can end hibernation and head out too. Houses habitually holding homebound hosts heighten horridly harmful hopelessness.

Is it innocuous? No illness is. Innovative inoculation is ideal, but impractical to the immediate issue: indefinite immobilization of industry is immoral if we are incapable of issuing indispensable items ex nihilo. (And we are.)

Jittery jerks judge judicious journeymen whose jobs they judge not-justified. But just about every Jack and Jill from janitors to jailers and even jet pilots just needs to juggle enough Jeffersons to buy jelly and jerky, and keep their junk out of jeopardy.

Keep calm. Knowledge kindles a knack for the kind of know-how we keenly need. Kick lengthy lockdowns, they’re ludicrous. Let locals live their lives.

Mask mandates make many people mighty mad. More mature and measured methods might mean more mellow manners. Merry multitudes might mutually agree to minimize maladies by more moderate means.

Negating the natural order with novel norms that necessitate nose coverings (never mind the no-work nonsense) is a nonstarter.

Oklahoma ought not overdo onerous ordinances. Ordinary operations ought to overrule orders from on high. Our overseers are not omniscient.

Purge the panic. Premature prognostications proved preposterous. Pull down the parabola? Performed. Proceed to previous patterns. Perpetual phobia pilfers precious periods of pleasant pastimes and productive pursuits. 

Quit quivering in quarantine. Reopen restaurants. Save stores. Treat every trade to toleration. A taste for toil ought to titillate every tradesman. Undo unnatural unemployment.

Viral response varies between the vivacious and the vulnerable. Versatility may be valuable in various responses. Vile vitriol is at variance from village values. Virile voters vying vigorously at various vocations are virtuous. Vivre et laisser vivre.

When will we be willing to work? Extended exclusion of exchange is an example of excessive executive orders and exhortations. You yelling yet? Zone out the zealots!

Advance Activities. Bring back business. Commence Commerce. Demand deregulation. Energize the economy. Finish fretting. Good grief!

Mike Davis is a Research Fellow at 1889 Institute. He can be reached at mdavis@1889institute.org.
The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the official position of 1889 Institute.



Popular posts from this blog

Licensing Boards Might Violate Federal Law: Regardless, They Are Terrible Policy

Competition is as American as baseball and apple pie. “May the best man win” is a sentiment so old it doesn’t care about your pronouns. The beneficial effects of competition on economic markets are well documented. So why do we let powerful business interests change the rules of the game when they tire of competing in the free market? Most of the time when an occupational license is enacted, it is the members of the regulated industry who push hardest in favor of the license. Honest competition may be fundamentally American, but thwarting that competition through licensing seems to be fundamentally Oklahoman. Oklahoma doesn’t have the most occupational licenses, but when they do license an occupation, the requirements tend to be more onerous than the same license in other states. But what if, instead of merely breaking the rules of fair play to keep out would-be competition, Oklahoma licensing boards are also breaking the law? Normally a concerted effort to lock out competition would v

Undo 802

Why is it that when conservatives suffer a major loss, they give up, accept the new status quo, and fall back to the next retreat position? When progressives suffer a major loss, they regroup and try again. And again. Until they finally wheedle the American public into giving in. I propose a change in strategy. The Oklahoma Legislature should make undoing State Question 802 its top legislative priority for 2021. This will not be an easy task (legislators seem to prefer avoiding difficult tasks) but it is a critical one. The normal legislative process, with all its pitfalls and traps for the unwary, will only bring the topic to another vote of the people. So why spend so much political capital and effort if the same result is possible? Three reasons.   First is the disastrous consequences of the policy. Forget that it enriches already-rich hospital and pharmaceutical executives. Forget that it gives the state incentives to prioritize the nearly-poor covered by expansion over the des

Oklahoma Mayors Acted Unlawfully With COVID-19 Orders

In response to COVID-19, the mayors of Oklahoma’s three largest cities subjected their citizens to draconian shelter in place orders, restricting their freedom, damaging them financially, and undermining their constitutional rights. The mayoral decrees were more restrictive than those of the Governor, and in significant ways contradicted his policy. To this day, city-mandated social distancing rules remain in place in Oklahoma City, Tulsa, and Norman that are not required by the state’s reopening plan. The mayors claim that where their rules are more restrictive than the state’s, the city rules apply. Was any of this unilateral mayoral activity legally valid? For the reasons examined in my paper published today, An Argument Oklahoma’s Mayors Acted Unlawfully During COVID-19 , the short answer is no. (A summary of the paper can be found here .) A close examination of relevant city ordinances and state laws governing the mayors’ COVID-19 decrees forces the conclusion tha

COVID-1984: Have Americans Become Too Complacent in Our Liberties?

Alongside the coronavirus, another pandemic is gripping our country, one that we will feel the consequences of long after we reach herd immunity. I dub this pandemic COVID-1984, and I fear it will rot the roots of the Tree of Liberty. The consequence will be a government emboldened by a passive citizenry. One of the most surprising aspects of our current situation is how willing people have been to report their fellow citizens to authorities for the most minor and meaningless offenses. I used to wonder how people in authoritarian countries like Stalinist Russia and Maoist China went along with those cruel regimes. It turns out a tiny bit of fear is all you need to be a successful dictator. And now it’s all the easier to report your neighbors for reading alone on the beach with tip lines.   Even as governors and judges begin to lift stay at home orders, mayors are extending them. A county judge issued a temporary restraining order against Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker’s stay at