Skip to main content

One More Suburban Draw: A Black Lives Matter Chapter in Every Oklahoma City School


“You don’t want to live in the Oklahoma City school district.” That was the universal advice I got from everyone I talked to in Oklahoma when I moved from Phoenix with my wife and son, who had a couple of years of high school left to complete. The clear and simple message was that Oklahoma City district schools were pitiful and should be avoided at all costs. You’d think that with a reputation like this, the last thing on the mind of the superintendent of Oklahoma City district schools would be to make sure every school has a Black Lives Matter chapter, but you’d be wrong.


I happened to see a recent meeting of the Oklahoma City school board, and that is exactly what the superintendent, Sean McDaniel, said, that he wanted to make sure every campus had a BLM chapter. You’d think that OKC district leaders would be concerned about academics, student motivation, and how to hold both students and educators more accountable for attaining what most people think schools are for – decent educations. Instead, proposed guiding principles for the district, in order, are: Health and Safety; Learning; Social and Emotional Needs; Equity; and Flexible Learning Models.


Only two of the five guiding principles actually have something directly to do with education, with one of these apparently just referencing the need for online instruction in response to Covid-19. “Health and safety” is a given, but it also seems to emphasize Covid-19. “Social and emotional needs” refers to the statewide emphasis on making excuses why children can’t learn and turning the schools into social work institutions. “Equity” is not about making sure every child in the district has access to the same resources. It’s explicitly about equity of outcomes, which means you can trash any notion of anyone in the OKC district attaining excellence since pursuing equity of outcome is inevitably a race to the bottom.


With respect to Black Lives Matter, let’s be clear here; the sentiment expressed by the name of the organization is not the same thing as the organization itself. The sentiment is unarguable. Human life, regardless of race, color, or creed, matters, so of course, black lives matter. However, BLM was cofounded by two avowed Marxists and is funded by radicals and radicalized organizations. They’ve rephrased and obfuscated their stated aims, but the internet tends to be unforgiving in preserving past, unguarded, un-scrubbed posts. The official platform from 2015 called for disrupting “the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.” While police brutality and misconduct is a real issue, BLM makes false and racist claims about differential impacts that are manifestly not true.


It seems that the OKC public schools leadership in particular, but increasingly public school leaders everywhere, are less concerned about the absolutely critical job of passing knowledge on to our youth and far more concerned with social transformation of a decidedly leftist bent. Maybe it’s ignorance on their part, or naiveté. Neither of these excuses engenders trust in individuals who are supposed to guide our children’s educations (at taxpayers’ expense).


And in fact, Oklahoma City district schools are pitiful. The state’s school report card grades schools on five criteria and an overall score is reported as well, for a total of six different A through F grades per school. Of the eleven graded high schools (17 are listed for the Oklahoma City district), the most common reported grade among the six categories, by far, is “F,” which more than doubles the number of D’s, triples the C’s, quintuples the B’s, and outnumbers the A’s by a factor of seven.


Three of the four A’s are earned by a single school, Classen High School of Advanced Studies. But even it earns an F for chronic absenteeism. It seems that poor discipline and a lack of standards don’t exactly inspire kids to attend school, much less try very hard, even at the best high school in Oklahoma City.


It’s one thing to turn schools into social work centers with education relegated to a secondary status. It’s another thing entirely to actively promote an ideology that undermines a way of life and an economic system that together have done more to advance human freedom and to raise humanity out of subsistence poverty than any others in the history of mankind. Hard-working Oklahoma taxpayers should not be forced to fund planting the seeds of future oppression and poverty, which will inevitably result from the ideological poison, and rank ignorance, being promoted by the Oklahoma City School District.


Byron Schlomach is 1889 Institute Director and can be contacted at bschlomach@1889institute.org. 


The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the official position of 1889 Institute.


Popular posts from this blog

Even If Pandemic Models Were Right, Were Covid Lockdowns Wrong?

1889 has been quite critical of pandemic modeling that government officials have relied on for their Covid-19 response. We have also criticized shutdown orders in light of flaws in the models. But let’s assume for a moment that the worst predictions really would have come true if nothing was done. Even in those worst case scenarios, it’s fair to ask if our governments did the right thing. Were involuntary shutdowns justified, or would people have found a way to both limit the contagion and maintain some level of productivity? Was putting healthy citizens under house arrest acceptable even if they were willing to risk infection?   While large groups of people are often compared to herd animals, we are not sheep. We don’t behave like animals. We can, have, and will step up when our communities are in danger. When government and journalists give incomplete or false information, people will act irrationally. Depending on the situation, some will blindly follow the first aut...

About Those Roads in Texas

A s Sooner fans head south for the OU-Texas game next week, they will encounter a phenomenon most of us are familiar with: as you cruise across the Red River suddenly the road gets noticeably smoother. The painted lane stripes get a little brighter and the roadside “Welcome to Texas” visitors’ center gleams in the sunlight, a modern and well-maintained reminder of how much more money the Lonestar State spends on public infrastructure than little old Oklahoma. Or does it? Why are the roads so much, well… better in Texas? Turns out, it isn’t the amount of money spent, at least not when compared to the overall size of the state’s economy and personal income of its inhabitants. Research conducted by 1889 Institute’s Byron Schlomach reveals that Oklahoma actually spends significantly more on roads than Texas as a percentage of both state GDP and personal income . And that was data from 2016, before Oklahoma’s tax and spending increases of recent years. The gap is likely gr...

1889 Institute's Statement Regarding School Closures

The 1889 Institute, an Oklahoma think tank, has released the following statement regarding Joy Hofmeister’s proposal to keep schools closed for the remainder of the school year. We at the 1889 Institute consider Joy Hofmeister’s proposal to close Oklahoma’s schools for the rest of the school year a gross overreaction to the coronavirus situation. Even in the best of times and circumstances, suddenly shifting every student in the state from traditional classrooms to online distance learning will have negative educational consequences. This in addition to the economic burden on two-earner families forced to completely reorder their lives with schools closed. We believe many of our leaders have overreacted to worst-case scenarios presented by well-intended health experts with no training or sense of proportion in weighing the collateral damage of shutting down our economy versus targeting resources to protect the truly vulnerable. We say reopen the schools and stop the madness. ...

Corporate Welfare is not OK

Largely buried under the constant barrage of COVID-19 news and the baffling decision by the Supreme Court to declare half of Oklahoma "Indian Country," was Oklahoma’s and Tulsa’s attempt to bribe Tesla to locate a new facility in that city. Tesla chose Austin, Texas instead, a decision Tesla likely made months ago, but for the opportunity Oklahoma's bid provided for milking as much as possible in concessions (bribery) from Austin. Thus, it may well be a blessing in disguise that Tesla chose Austin over Tulsa. After all, Oklahomans aren't on the hook to pay off a big corporation that is perfectly capable of financially taking care of itself. What's more, consider what might have happened if the deal had been made and ground had been broken before the McGirt decision. Tesla likely would have had to pull out of the deal, and might well have sued the state for bad faith negotiating, which have reflected poorly on Tulsa and Oklahoma.   One study estimates corporations...