Skip to main content

One More Suburban Draw: A Black Lives Matter Chapter in Every Oklahoma City School

“You don’t want to live in the Oklahoma City school district.” That was the universal advice I got from everyone I talked to in Oklahoma when I moved from Phoenix with my wife and son, who had a couple of years of high school left to complete. The clear and simple message was that Oklahoma City district schools were pitiful and should be avoided at all costs. You’d think that with a reputation like this, the last thing on the mind of the superintendent of Oklahoma City district schools would be to make sure every school has a Black Lives Matter chapter, but you’d be wrong.

I happened to see a recent meeting of the Oklahoma City school board, and that is exactly what the superintendent, Sean McDaniel, said, that he wanted to make sure every campus had a BLM chapter. You’d think that OKC district leaders would be concerned about academics, student motivation, and how to hold both students and educators more accountable for attaining what most people think schools are for – decent educations. Instead, proposed guiding principles for the district, in order, are: Health and Safety; Learning; Social and Emotional Needs; Equity; and Flexible Learning Models.

Only two of the five guiding principles actually have something directly to do with education, with one of these apparently just referencing the need for online instruction in response to Covid-19. “Health and safety” is a given, but it also seems to emphasize Covid-19. “Social and emotional needs” refers to the statewide emphasis on making excuses why children can’t learn and turning the schools into social work institutions. “Equity” is not about making sure every child in the district has access to the same resources. It’s explicitly about equity of outcomes, which means you can trash any notion of anyone in the OKC district attaining excellence since pursuing equity of outcome is inevitably a race to the bottom.

With respect to Black Lives Matter, let’s be clear here; the sentiment expressed by the name of the organization is not the same thing as the organization itself. The sentiment is unarguable. Human life, regardless of race, color, or creed, matters, so of course, black lives matter. However, BLM was cofounded by two avowed Marxists and is funded by radicals and radicalized organizations. They’ve rephrased and obfuscated their stated aims, but the internet tends to be unforgiving in preserving past, unguarded, un-scrubbed posts. The official platform from 2015 called for disrupting “the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.” While police brutality and misconduct is a real issue, BLM makes false and racist claims about differential impacts that are manifestly not true.

It seems that the OKC public schools leadership in particular, but increasingly public school leaders everywhere, are less concerned about the absolutely critical job of passing knowledge on to our youth and far more concerned with social transformation of a decidedly leftist bent. Maybe it’s ignorance on their part, or naiveté. Neither of these excuses engenders trust in individuals who are supposed to guide our children’s educations (at taxpayers’ expense).

And in fact, Oklahoma City district schools are pitiful. The state’s school report card grades schools on five criteria and an overall score is reported as well, for a total of six different A through F grades per school. Of the eleven graded high schools (17 are listed for the Oklahoma City district), the most common reported grade among the six categories, by far, is “F,” which more than doubles the number of D’s, triples the C’s, quintuples the B’s, and outnumbers the A’s by a factor of seven.

Three of the four A’s are earned by a single school, Classen High School of Advanced Studies. But even it earns an F for chronic absenteeism. It seems that poor discipline and a lack of standards don’t exactly inspire kids to attend school, much less try very hard, even at the best high school in Oklahoma City.

It’s one thing to turn schools into social work centers with education relegated to a secondary status. It’s another thing entirely to actively promote an ideology that undermines a way of life and an economic system that together have done more to advance human freedom and to raise humanity out of subsistence poverty than any others in the history of mankind. Hard-working Oklahoma taxpayers should not be forced to fund planting the seeds of future oppression and poverty, which will inevitably result from the ideological poison, and rank ignorance, being promoted by the Oklahoma City School District.

Byron Schlomach is 1889 Institute Director and can be contacted at 

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the official position of 1889 Institute.

Popular posts from this blog

Present Reforms to Keep the Ghost of State Questions Past from Creating Future Headaches

Oklahoma, like many western states, allows its citizens to directly participate in the democratic process through citizen initiatives and referendums. In a referendum, the legislature directs a question to the people — usually to modify the state constitution, since the legislature can change statutes itself. An initiative requires no legislative involvement, but is initiated by the people via signature gathering, and can be used to modify statute or amend the constitution. Collectively, the initiatives and referendums that make it onto the ballot are known as State Questions.   Recently, there have been calls to make it more difficult to amend the constitution. At least two proposals are being discussed. One would diversify the signature requirement by demanding that a proportional amount of signatures come from each region of the state. The other would require a sixty percent majority to adopt a constitutional amendment rather than the fifty percent plus one currently in place. Both

Oklahoma Mayors Acted Unlawfully With COVID-19 Orders

In response to COVID-19, the mayors of Oklahoma’s three largest cities subjected their citizens to draconian shelter in place orders, restricting their freedom, damaging them financially, and undermining their constitutional rights. The mayoral decrees were more restrictive than those of the Governor, and in significant ways contradicted his policy. To this day, city-mandated social distancing rules remain in place in Oklahoma City, Tulsa, and Norman that are not required by the state’s reopening plan. The mayors claim that where their rules are more restrictive than the state’s, the city rules apply. Was any of this unilateral mayoral activity legally valid? For the reasons examined in my paper published today, An Argument Oklahoma’s Mayors Acted Unlawfully During COVID-19 , the short answer is no. (A summary of the paper can be found here .) A close examination of relevant city ordinances and state laws governing the mayors’ COVID-19 decrees forces the conclusion tha

If Data Is Supposed to Be Our Guide, the Great Coronavirus Shutdown of 2020 Should End

According to the most widely cited model projecting the course of the coronavirus outbreak, today is supposed to be Oklahoma’s peak in daily deaths. Now is a good time to go back to the beginning of the Great Coronavirus Shutdown of 2020, review the goal of our policy, and assess our current status. If our policy should be “data-driven,” as we are constantly told, then let’s actually look at the data and determine our next policy steps accordingly. Spoiler alert: according to the terms set out by those advocating for the shutdown policy, the policy’s continuance is no longer justified. The stated goal of the shutdown policy was to “flatten the curve” so as to prevent hospitals from becoming overwhelmed with COVID patients. The fear was that the virus would spread so fast that at its peak, the number of cases would exceed the overall capacity of the healthcare system. If that peak could be stretched out over a longer period of time, lives would be saved. This concept was il

When It Comes to the Cox Center, “What if I Get to Meet a Movie Star?” Isn’t Good Enough

In a recent   post , 1889 Institute expounded on the fiduciary duty of elected officials “to act in the best interest of the people of the state as a whole,” a “high duty, executed as a public trust … wherein one puts the people’s interest above one’s own.” This fiduciary duty must not stop with elected officials. Once an elected body or an elected official – the legislature, a city council, the governor, or a mayor – has taken final action, the faithful implementation of each enacted law, policy, or program falls to an army of bureaucrats. Thus, a fiduciary duty to execute laws and policies with diligence and integrity, tantamount to that of elected officials, must extend to government employees. Recently, I had a few moments to sit down and watch a show with my children. Unsurprisingly, my son picked a series entitled “The Stinky and Dirty Show.” I was naturally skeptical that the show would yield any real value. However, as I watched, I found myself pleasantly surprised. Each episod