Skip to main content

One More Suburban Draw: A Black Lives Matter Chapter in Every Oklahoma City School


“You don’t want to live in the Oklahoma City school district.” That was the universal advice I got from everyone I talked to in Oklahoma when I moved from Phoenix with my wife and son, who had a couple of years of high school left to complete. The clear and simple message was that Oklahoma City district schools were pitiful and should be avoided at all costs. You’d think that with a reputation like this, the last thing on the mind of the superintendent of Oklahoma City district schools would be to make sure every school has a Black Lives Matter chapter, but you’d be wrong.


I happened to see a recent meeting of the Oklahoma City school board, and that is exactly what the superintendent, Sean McDaniel, said, that he wanted to make sure every campus had a BLM chapter. You’d think that OKC district leaders would be concerned about academics, student motivation, and how to hold both students and educators more accountable for attaining what most people think schools are for – decent educations. Instead, proposed guiding principles for the district, in order, are: Health and Safety; Learning; Social and Emotional Needs; Equity; and Flexible Learning Models.


Only two of the five guiding principles actually have something directly to do with education, with one of these apparently just referencing the need for online instruction in response to Covid-19. “Health and safety” is a given, but it also seems to emphasize Covid-19. “Social and emotional needs” refers to the statewide emphasis on making excuses why children can’t learn and turning the schools into social work institutions. “Equity” is not about making sure every child in the district has access to the same resources. It’s explicitly about equity of outcomes, which means you can trash any notion of anyone in the OKC district attaining excellence since pursuing equity of outcome is inevitably a race to the bottom.


With respect to Black Lives Matter, let’s be clear here; the sentiment expressed by the name of the organization is not the same thing as the organization itself. The sentiment is unarguable. Human life, regardless of race, color, or creed, matters, so of course, black lives matter. However, BLM was cofounded by two avowed Marxists and is funded by radicals and radicalized organizations. They’ve rephrased and obfuscated their stated aims, but the internet tends to be unforgiving in preserving past, unguarded, un-scrubbed posts. The official platform from 2015 called for disrupting “the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.” While police brutality and misconduct is a real issue, BLM makes false and racist claims about differential impacts that are manifestly not true.


It seems that the OKC public schools leadership in particular, but increasingly public school leaders everywhere, are less concerned about the absolutely critical job of passing knowledge on to our youth and far more concerned with social transformation of a decidedly leftist bent. Maybe it’s ignorance on their part, or naiveté. Neither of these excuses engenders trust in individuals who are supposed to guide our children’s educations (at taxpayers’ expense).


And in fact, Oklahoma City district schools are pitiful. The state’s school report card grades schools on five criteria and an overall score is reported as well, for a total of six different A through F grades per school. Of the eleven graded high schools (17 are listed for the Oklahoma City district), the most common reported grade among the six categories, by far, is “F,” which more than doubles the number of D’s, triples the C’s, quintuples the B’s, and outnumbers the A’s by a factor of seven.


Three of the four A’s are earned by a single school, Classen High School of Advanced Studies. But even it earns an F for chronic absenteeism. It seems that poor discipline and a lack of standards don’t exactly inspire kids to attend school, much less try very hard, even at the best high school in Oklahoma City.


It’s one thing to turn schools into social work centers with education relegated to a secondary status. It’s another thing entirely to actively promote an ideology that undermines a way of life and an economic system that together have done more to advance human freedom and to raise humanity out of subsistence poverty than any others in the history of mankind. Hard-working Oklahoma taxpayers should not be forced to fund planting the seeds of future oppression and poverty, which will inevitably result from the ideological poison, and rank ignorance, being promoted by the Oklahoma City School District.


Byron Schlomach is 1889 Institute Director and can be contacted at bschlomach@1889institute.org. 


The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the official position of 1889 Institute.


Popular posts from this blog

Same Ol’ Story: Blocking Opportunity, Freedom, Prosperity

I know. Sometimes we sound like a broken record. ANOTHER blog about licensing? Long-term care administration licensing? Seriously? Does this theme not get old? Well, yeah, it’s old. We wish we could stop writing about what may very well be the stupidest, most onerous, and most disgusting type of regulation on the books. Frankly, until something is done about it, we don’t believe we have a choice. And more should be getting done. This is not a partisan issue, after all. The Obama administration put out a white paper on the over-abundance of licensing in the United States and its deleterious effects. Nevertheless, Oklahoma has a do-nothing Occupational Licensing Advisory Commission headed by Labor Commissioner Leslie Osborn who clearly couldn’t care less. They rarely meet and almost never recommend that the legislature repeal a license. Nonetheless, NOTHING is more fundamental to freedom than the ownership of oneself. Therefore, the most basic freedom we have is the right to sell our...

1889 Institute's Statement Regarding School Closures

The 1889 Institute, an Oklahoma think tank, has released the following statement regarding Joy Hofmeister’s proposal to keep schools closed for the remainder of the school year. We at the 1889 Institute consider Joy Hofmeister’s proposal to close Oklahoma’s schools for the rest of the school year a gross overreaction to the coronavirus situation. Even in the best of times and circumstances, suddenly shifting every student in the state from traditional classrooms to online distance learning will have negative educational consequences. This in addition to the economic burden on two-earner families forced to completely reorder their lives with schools closed. We believe many of our leaders have overreacted to worst-case scenarios presented by well-intended health experts with no training or sense of proportion in weighing the collateral damage of shutting down our economy versus targeting resources to protect the truly vulnerable. We say reopen the schools and stop the madness. ...

Can Government Force You to Close Your Business?

1889 Institute takes no position on whether any or all of these measures are warranted or necessary, or whether their economic fallout would inflict more human suffering than they prevent. We are simply evaluating whether they are legal.   With the unprecedented (in the last 100 years at least) reaction surrounding the outbreak of Covid-19, questions that few living legal scholars have considered are suddenly relevant.   Can a quarantine be ordered?   Can a mass quarantine, lockdown, or “cordon sanitaire” be ordered? Can businesses be ordered to change their behavior?   Can businesses be ordered to close? Can state governments order these measures? Can local governments order these measures? My legal brief addresses these issues from a statutory point of view; it is clear that state law gives the governor and mayors broad authority in a state of emergency. They must, of course, do so in a neutral way that they reasonably believe will help preve...

The Bravery of Those Who Died to Defend Us Highlights Our Cowardice

Memorial Day commemorates those who died in military service to our country. These people died not for a chunk of land, for the natural resources available on that chunk of land, nor for any such simple material possession. They died for an idea, a way of life, as well as for each other. We used to be the Land of the Free, and the Home of the Brave. Now we're the land of the lockdown and the home of the trepidatious.   The bravery of heroes past has been replaced by dirty looks for those who dare to go outside without a mask - even in their own cars – where mask wearing, at best, can only be justified as a sign of solidarity . But solidarity for what? Certainly not freedom. That solidarity happens when people stand shoulder to shoulder against the jackboots who would take someone to jail for what now appears to be the shocking desire to earn a living to feed a family. What follows are three stories of heroism, and four contrasting acts of cowardice. May the deeds of the...