Skip to main content

How to Be Number One in Government Transparency

A 2020 HBO movie entitled Bad Education, starring Hugh Jackman, tells the story of Frank Tassone, a real-life superintendent of the Roslyn, New York school district who along with an accomplice, it was discovered in 2004, stole an overall total of $11.2 million in district funds. Its been called the largest public school embezzlement in U.S. history.” It should be called the largest public school embezzlement ever discovered in U.S. history” because there is no way to be sure that a worse theft has not occurred. The theft would never have been discovered had Tassones partner in crime, Pamela Gluckin, not had her son buy $83,000 in home remodeling supplies on the schools credit card. But for alert Home Depot employees, Gluckin and Tassone likely would have gotten away with their theft, carried out over years, to this day.

The movies dramatization of a student reporter digging into filed receipts and investigating suspicious (fake) vendors likely reflects the hard work of real-life reporters at the time. The sleuthing portrayed in the movie involved many hours combing through piles of invoices stored in a basement room and then calling (or attempting to call) suspect vendors.

A Vision for Transparency

But what if reporters and amateur sleuths, whether students, parents, or taxpayers, could look at a school districts transactions, receipts, and invoices after downloading from the internet, without having to file Freedom of Information Act requests, without going to court for access, and without digging through boxes in a basement? Would a Frank Tassone or a Pamela Gluckin steal more than a pittance if they thought somebody could look over their shoulders so easily? Likely not. In fact, a study of transparency requirements associated with the federal Recovery Act points out that [t]ransparency requirements served as a deterrent which contributed to low rates of fraud, waste, and abuse of funds.”

This has always been the promise of transparency in government. Just the threat that someone might get a good look at a government agencys financial inner workings would be enough to discourage untoward activities, and not just outright stealing. Lets admit the obvious; its highly likely that for every discovered example of malfeasance, there are many more that remain undiscovered. Thats because a random hunt for fraudulent government transactions by a concerned taxpayer, activist, or think tank analyst, in ideal circumstances, is enough of a Wheres Waldo?” exercise in itself that the mildest of impediments can be highly discouraging. 

Transparency must be routinized and standardized in a way that makes sense and allows a citizen observer/investigator to get to the most important information with as little cost as possible. Thus, the purpose of 1889s recent paper, A Vision for Transparency, which suggests the most efficient and effective form that transparency in government can take. 

When done properly, transparency can lead to greater public trust and support among citizens, according to one 2012 study. Nevertheless, it often seems governments are reticent to give up information even if it only allows waste to be identified. The Oklahoma legislature actually required the state’s education agency to delete readily available spending data because they apparently grew tired of explaining how it was different from federal data. It is hard to imagine anything that could do more to bring about distrust of government. 

Although with Governor Stitts transparency initiative, the State of Oklahoma is more transparent than many states, much is still left to be done. Local governments are not as transparent as they should be, and the state itself could see improvement, as demonstrated by the legislatures irresponsible action with school expenditures. The paper explains in depth why all of the information that follows should be made readily available to the public everywhere, at every level of government.

Crucial Information that Every Citizen Should Be Able to Access

Every citizen should have ready access to the following information through a state-maintained website usable free-of-charge:

  • A list of every government that presides over that citizen’s address, including enterprise entities such as electric co-ops, and rural water districts,
  • Readily available standardized basic information about every single governmental entity in the list of governments,
  • Every single payment of funds from each government’s coffers, 
  • A listing of each government’s assets, updated on a reasonable periodic basis,
  • Every single non-tax revenue payment made to each government entity.

The state should maintain a website that provides the information contained in the first bullet above, with links to standardized web-based information described by the other bullets provided by each individual governmental entity, including the state and its agencies, and all local governments. A citizen should be able to access a state-maintained website, type in an address, and obtain a list of all governmental entities that have independent decision-making bodies that govern over that address.

Basic Governance Information

  • For states and cities, a list of independent policy-making offices/entities/agencies including governor, legislature, secretary of state, agriculture commissioner, etc. for the state; mayor/city council, zoning board, TIF boards, etc. for cities,
  • For every entity:
    • Name and contact information of every policy-making official, preferably both e-mail and phone (legally, there should be no exceptions for contact information),
    • How each official obtained office – whether elected or appointed; if appointed, by whom,
    • When each official first took office and the date of the end of the current term,
    • Election dates applicable to the entity over the next two years with special attention for called elections,
    • Taxes for which the entity is responsible and current tax rates,
    • Links to statutes/rules/ordinances for which the entity is responsible,
    • Links to expenditure/asset/revenue information (described below),
    • Links to websites maintained by the entity.

Spending: The Government’s Check Register

An investigator (taxpayer, journalist, accountant, or paid researcher) really only needs three basic pieces of information for each transaction. These include:

  1. Who got paid,
  2. How much was paid,
  3. What the expenditure was for (not just object, function, and fund codes, but a memo line, too).

Government Assets

Every government asset above a minimum threshold should be identified, quantified as necessary, and listed with its initial purchase price for perusal by the citizenry.

Non-tax Revenues

Government runs a number of self-funded, or nearly self-funded enterprises, including sanitation (garbage) service, water service, sewer service, parks service, hunting license service, occupational licensing (dis)service, hospitals, auto licensing, and the list goes on. Many revenue transactions occur that do not represent taxation. Taxpayers deserve to know they are all be charged and treated equally.

With the traditional press in decline, we all the more urgently must make transparency work as well as possible. We have to be selective about what specific information is to be made available, taking care to make it available in a way that it can actually be read and analyzed effectively. Otherwise, the sheer volume of information, along with useless drivel, can so camouflage waste, fraud, and abuse that it is hidden in plain sight. 

Byron Schlomach is 1889 Institute Director. He can be reached at

Popular posts from this blog

Cronyism: Feature, Not a Bug, for Used Car Dealer Licensing

Used car dealers in Oklahoma are governed by the Oklahoma Used Motor Vehicle and Parts Commission (UMPV). Like most licensing boards, it is made up of industry insiders. The UMVP's stated mission is to protect consumers from harm, but its structure and history indicate that its primary concern might be protecting licensed dealers from competition. This, of course, is the prime directive of all licensing boards. My recent paper deals with the licensing of used car dealers.   The person hit hardest by this is the hobbyist, especially in times of economic turmoil.   Imagine someone stuck at home due to coronavirus. We'll call him Frank. He can’t work due to the economic shutdown. Unfortunately, Frank’s lack of work does not mean he no longer has to put food on the table for his family. Fortunately for him, he is able to find a good deal on a used car that needs a little work. Frank has all the tools and garage space necessary to fix up the car and isn't violating any quar

If Data Is Supposed to Be Our Guide, the Great Coronavirus Shutdown of 2020 Should End

According to the most widely cited model projecting the course of the coronavirus outbreak, today is supposed to be Oklahoma’s peak in daily deaths. Now is a good time to go back to the beginning of the Great Coronavirus Shutdown of 2020, review the goal of our policy, and assess our current status. If our policy should be “data-driven,” as we are constantly told, then let’s actually look at the data and determine our next policy steps accordingly. Spoiler alert: according to the terms set out by those advocating for the shutdown policy, the policy’s continuance is no longer justified. The stated goal of the shutdown policy was to “flatten the curve” so as to prevent hospitals from becoming overwhelmed with COVID patients. The fear was that the virus would spread so fast that at its peak, the number of cases would exceed the overall capacity of the healthcare system. If that peak could be stretched out over a longer period of time, lives would be saved. This concept was il

Even If Pandemic Models Were Right, Were Covid Lockdowns Wrong?

1889 has been quite critical of pandemic modeling that government officials have relied on for their Covid-19 response. We have also criticized shutdown orders in light of flaws in the models. But let’s assume for a moment that the worst predictions really would have come true if nothing was done. Even in those worst case scenarios, it’s fair to ask if our governments did the right thing. Were involuntary shutdowns justified, or would people have found a way to both limit the contagion and maintain some level of productivity? Was putting healthy citizens under house arrest acceptable even if they were willing to risk infection?   While large groups of people are often compared to herd animals, we are not sheep. We don’t behave like animals. We can, have, and will step up when our communities are in danger. When government and journalists give incomplete or false information, people will act irrationally. Depending on the situation, some will blindly follow the first authori

When It Comes to the Cox Center, “What if I Get to Meet a Movie Star?” Isn’t Good Enough

In a recent   post , 1889 Institute expounded on the fiduciary duty of elected officials “to act in the best interest of the people of the state as a whole,” a “high duty, executed as a public trust … wherein one puts the people’s interest above one’s own.” This fiduciary duty must not stop with elected officials. Once an elected body or an elected official – the legislature, a city council, the governor, or a mayor – has taken final action, the faithful implementation of each enacted law, policy, or program falls to an army of bureaucrats. Thus, a fiduciary duty to execute laws and policies with diligence and integrity, tantamount to that of elected officials, must extend to government employees. Recently, I had a few moments to sit down and watch a show with my children. Unsurprisingly, my son picked a series entitled “The Stinky and Dirty Show.” I was naturally skeptical that the show would yield any real value. However, as I watched, I found myself pleasantly surprised. Each episod