Skip to main content

Cronyism: Feature, Not a Bug, for Used Car Dealer Licensing


Used car dealers in Oklahoma are governed by the Oklahoma Used Motor Vehicle and Parts Commission (UMPV). Like most licensing boards, it is made up of industry insiders. The UMVP's stated mission is to protect consumers from harm, but its structure and history indicate that its primary concern might be protecting licensed dealers from competition. This, of course, is the prime directive of all licensing boards. My recent paper deals with the licensing of used car dealers. 

The person hit hardest by this is the hobbyist, especially in times of economic turmoil.  Imagine someone stuck at home due to coronavirus. We'll call him Frank. He can’t work due to the economic shutdown. Unfortunately, Frank’s lack of work does not mean he no longer has to put food on the table for his family. Fortunately for him, he is able to find a good deal on a used car that needs a little work. Frank has all the tools and garage space necessary to fix up the car and isn't violating any quarantine rules while doing so. He sells the car for a tidy profit, which is enough to sustain his family until he is granted the “privilege” of working again. 

In a state without cronyism, the above story would end there. But Oklahoma is not a cronyism free state. Shortly after selling the car, he fixed up the UMPV shows up at his door. They slap him with a fine for not being licensed by them. Afterward, Frank attempts to get a license but is denied. While his garage is suitable for fixing used cars, it doesn't have adequate space to display his vehicles or a parking lot for customers. Nor does he have any industry experience. Frank has to give up any additional income he could have made from selling used cars. 

If he wished to continue fixing and selling used cars Franks would have to pay a $600 fee to obtain a license. On top of the fee, he is required to own a building that fits what the UMPV believes is necessary to conduct the business of dealing used cars. The building must have a certain amount of parking for customers and display vehicles, a sales office, and a sign of minimum size. Additionally, Frank would need to be bonded. Once Frank does meet these requirements, he can apply for a license, but he may still be denied one by the Commission.

Licensing boards will sometimes be created not necessarily for anti-competitive intent but to protect a profession from being swallowed into the regulatory scheme of another. There isn’t much difference between selling new cars and selling used cars. The Oklahoma Motor Vehicle Commission regulates new car dealers, who enjoy incredibly strong protections that shield them from competition. Fearing the idea that a body of new car dealers could govern them, used car dealers pushed for their own licensing agency. But no matter how noble the intent, licensing always becomes a cronyist scheme that benefits industry insiders. This is likely the case with used car dealers who sought to avoid the more burdensome regulations of new car dealers, such as the 15-mile radius rule. 

The problems that arise with licensing could be avoided with other regulatory schemes or putting laws into place to prevent licensing boards from increasing their scope. However, those with cronyist intentions appear to have seen the chance to really take control of the market and pushed for strict regulations on who can become a used car dealer and, by doing so, drove up their prices. Most importantly, they were able to outlaw the sale of all used cars by anyone but a licensed dealer. By contrast, most states will allow for individuals without a license to sell a limited number of cars a year. 

The UMPV uses its powers to protect its licensees from competition by putting unnecessary and costly barriers in the way of would-be practitioners. Besides the requirements for a place of business mentioned above, the Commission requires applicants to have industry experience to get a license to work in the industry. This creates a catch-22 for prospective dealers. They need industry experience to get a license, but they can’t get industry experience without a license. Of course, the Commission can waive this requirement on a case by case basis. This way, their friends aren’t affected. 

The Oklahoma legislature should deregulate the used car industry and allow Oklahomans to buy and sell used cars from each other without any interference from the state. The freedom to fix up and sell old cars represents an opportunity for any Oklahoman make a living or earn income on the side. There was never a problem with consumers buying cars from unlicensed dealers before licensing unless you consider lower profits for used car dealers to be problematic.


Spencer Cadavero is a Research Associate at 1889 Institute and can be reached at scadavero@1889institute.org. 

Popular posts from this blog

Licensing Boards Might Violate Federal Law: Regardless, They Are Terrible Policy

Competition is as American as baseball and apple pie. “May the best man win” is a sentiment so old it doesn’t care about your pronouns. The beneficial effects of competition on economic markets are well documented. So why do we let powerful business interests change the rules of the game when they tire of competing in the free market? Most of the time when an occupational license is enacted, it is the members of the regulated industry who push hardest in favor of the license. Honest competition may be fundamentally American, but thwarting that competition through licensing seems to be fundamentally Oklahoman. Oklahoma doesn’t have the most occupational licenses, but when they do license an occupation, the requirements tend to be more onerous than the same license in other states. But what if, instead of merely breaking the rules of fair play to keep out would-be competition, Oklahoma licensing boards are also breaking the law? Normally a concerted effort to lock out competition would v

Undo 802

Why is it that when conservatives suffer a major loss, they give up, accept the new status quo, and fall back to the next retreat position? When progressives suffer a major loss, they regroup and try again. And again. Until they finally wheedle the American public into giving in. I propose a change in strategy. The Oklahoma Legislature should make undoing State Question 802 its top legislative priority for 2021. This will not be an easy task (legislators seem to prefer avoiding difficult tasks) but it is a critical one. The normal legislative process, with all its pitfalls and traps for the unwary, will only bring the topic to another vote of the people. So why spend so much political capital and effort if the same result is possible? Three reasons.   First is the disastrous consequences of the policy. Forget that it enriches already-rich hospital and pharmaceutical executives. Forget that it gives the state incentives to prioritize the nearly-poor covered by expansion over the des

How Biden/Harris and Well-educated Sophisticates Are Wrong in the Age of COVID-19

Vice President-elect Kamala Harris often declared during the campaign that “We believe in science.” And judging by the tendency of the college-educated , especially among the sophisticates living on the coasts, to agree with Harris’s positions on everything from climate change to proper precautions amid COVID-19, belief in “science” seems to many a mark of knowledge and wisdom. But is it? The modern belief in “science” increasingly appears to be a religion wherein the words of certain recognized experts are received with the reverence once reserved for the Pope. A college diploma almost serves as a permission slip to suspend one’s own judgment and reason in favor of taking the word of certain experts to heart, especially if they work in government, certain universities, or gain media credence.   This tendency to turn experts and the media into high priests of all knowledge is nothing new. In 1986, 60 Minutes ran a story about a phenomenon people experienced in cars with automatic tra

Liability In the Time of Covid: When Should Businesses Be Sued for the Spread of Infectious Disease?

When businesses reopen, what liability should they face related to the spread of Covid? Can businesses who remained open during the pandemic, or those who were open before the lockdowns began, be held liable if their customers caught the virus within the businesses’ walls? If so, what would a customer-plaintiff need to prove?   Defending even a meritless lawsuit can be prohibitively expensive. For this reason, it is important to define ahead of time what harms can lead to successful lawsuits. Limitations on causes of action can reduce unwarranted suits by kicking them out of the legal system earlier in the process. So what should businesses be liable for? There are two distinct categories of business liability that might arise from Covid. The first is products liability. The second is liability for infection spread within a business.   Products Liability First, any willful fraud perpetrated in relation to Covid should be severely punished. This would include selling f