Skip to main content

COVID-19 Proves Our Schools Are Social Service Centers First, Education Institutions Second


There is no way the 180-day (or 1,080 hours) school year can be completed by the end of previously established school calendars for this year given the fact that spring break has now already been effectively extended an additional two weeks. One option would have been to extend the school year into the summer. Given the level of family togetherness being experienced now, and the fact that incomes are being lost and many would be interested in making up the losses, it’s not unreasonable to expect vacation plans to be radically remade or canceled anyway. Instead, Oklahoma’s State Board of Education precipitously closed the schools and did not call for an extension of end-of-school dates. Thus, the summer option has been foreclosed.

The State Board is within its rights. Oklahoma statutes (70 O.S. § 1-109 E) state, “A school district may maintain school for less than a full school year only when conditions beyond the control of school authorities make the maintenance of the term impossible and the State Board of Education has been apprised and has expressed concurrence in writing.”

So on March 25th, the State Board of Education effectively suspended school activities in school buildings for the rest of the year by closing school buildings. Emergency rules have been promulgated that mandate all school districts implement distance learning. Undoubtedly, this has brought about a good deal of frenetic, and very real, work activity in districts that had never planned for widespread distance learning, have no expertise in distance learning, and are in the unenviable position of having to start effectively from zero to get something up and running.

Nonetheless, an official State Department of Education document says “Districts are expected to continue providing learning opportunities for students through the end of the school year and thereby afford students the opportunity to earn grades.” That vague statement doesn’t mean anything like truly rigorous learning will occur. The fact is that a significant portion of the current school year is being lost. While distance learning has proved effective, this is true when the people implementing it have had time to get it right. The public schools, in an emergency, have not had that time. 

Teachers throughout the state would be introducing new material to students right now. New assignments to better cement content in students’ minds, and to assess their progress, would have been given. Some of the loss in learning can be made up next year. Much of the beginning of any school year is review, but graduating seniors have now had their last crucial year in high school cut short. And there is no denying that the suspension of school for over two months represents an educational setback in a state that really cannot afford any educational setbacks.

Meanwhile, schools continue to deliver meals. In fact, odds are that the hardest-working people at our schools right now are food preparers and those who are passing out the food. While it’s true that food is an absolute basic necessity while learning is not, it is also true that the survival of our civilization turns on education. 

As the philosopher/political theorist Hannah Arendt put it, “Every generation, civilization is invaded by barbarians – we call them ‘children’.” And as economist Thomas Sowell has put it, “Each new generation born is in effect an invasion of civilization by little barbarians, who must be civilized before it is too late.”

It is this mission, expressed so bluntly by Sowell, to civilize and educate each new generation, that the public school system was originally organized to accomplish. Given what we spend on them, they do not do it well, even when they aren’t being shut down by strikes and virus panics. But it seems they do a pretty good job of keeping the food mission open, no matter what. 

And this is the problem that the Wuhan virus has brought into stark relief. The public education system really should have only one mission – to educate kids – and should focus on that mission to the exclusion of all else. And if it were focused on that mission, perhaps the State Board would have extended school into the summer.

Instead, we have given public schools the mission of providing nutrition, the mission of providing transportation, the mission of providing mental health services, the mission of providing general health services, the mission of providing daycare (pre-K), and the mission of providing local entertainments. Public schools’ education mission has become secondary, at best, and it shows. So they’re still open to deliver meals, but they’re effectively closed to deliver educational content.

Byron Schlomach is Director of 1889 Institute. He can be contacted at bschlomach@1889institute.org.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the official position of 1889 Institute.

Popular posts from this blog

Lies We Tell in Government, and Our Debts to Truth

HBO’s mini-series,  Chernobyl ,  is a drama depicting  the disastrous  1986  explosion ,  and  hero ic efforts to control the  resulting  meltdown ,  of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine  (then part of the Soviet Union ).  A flawed man, but true hero,  Valery  Alexeyvich   Legasov , worked tirelessly to ameliorate the disaster’s consequences and  chiefly  investigated its cause. He was  Deputy Director of the  Kurchatov  Institute of Atomic Energ y , a Soviet elite, who  is portrayed at the end of  the  series making a dramatic speech at a trial about how the nuclear reactor exploded, when  such an explosion in that type of reactor  should not have been possible. In the course of the series, the audience  learns  that the reactor had a design flaw that had been covered up by the Soviet State (true).  The audience also learns  that...
Read more

When It Comes to the Cox Center, “What if I Get to Meet a Movie Star?” Isn’t Good Enough

In a recent   post , 1889 Institute expounded on the fiduciary duty of elected officials “to act in the best interest of the people of the state as a whole,” a “high duty, executed as a public trust … wherein one puts the people’s interest above one’s own.” This fiduciary duty must not stop with elected officials. Once an elected body or an elected official – the legislature, a city council, the governor, or a mayor – has taken final action, the faithful implementation of each enacted law, policy, or program falls to an army of bureaucrats. Thus, a fiduciary duty to execute laws and policies with diligence and integrity, tantamount to that of elected officials, must extend to government employees. Recently, I had a few moments to sit down and watch a show with my children. Unsurprisingly, my son picked a series entitled “The Stinky and Dirty Show.” I was naturally skeptical that the show would yield any real value. However, as I watched, I found myself pleasantly surprised. Each ep...
Read more

Present Reforms to Keep the Ghost of State Questions Past from Creating Future Headaches

Oklahoma, like many western states, allows its citizens to directly participate in the democratic process through citizen initiatives and referendums. In a referendum, the legislature directs a question to the people — usually to modify the state constitution, since the legislature can change statutes itself. An initiative requires no legislative involvement, but is initiated by the people via signature gathering, and can be used to modify statute or amend the constitution. Collectively, the initiatives and referendums that make it onto the ballot are known as State Questions.   Recently, there have been calls to make it more difficult to amend the constitution. At least two proposals are being discussed. One would diversify the signature requirement by demanding that a proportional amount of signatures come from each region of the state. The other would require a sixty percent majority to adopt a constitutional amendment rather than the fifty percent plus one currently in place. ...
Read more

The Bravery of Those Who Died to Defend Us Highlights Our Cowardice

Memorial Day commemorates those who died in military service to our country. These people died not for a chunk of land, for the natural resources available on that chunk of land, nor for any such simple material possession. They died for an idea, a way of life, as well as for each other. We used to be the Land of the Free, and the Home of the Brave. Now we're the land of the lockdown and the home of the trepidatious.   The bravery of heroes past has been replaced by dirty looks for those who dare to go outside without a mask - even in their own cars – where mask wearing, at best, can only be justified as a sign of solidarity . But solidarity for what? Certainly not freedom. That solidarity happens when people stand shoulder to shoulder against the jackboots who would take someone to jail for what now appears to be the shocking desire to earn a living to feed a family. What follows are three stories of heroism, and four contrasting acts of cowardice. May the deeds of the...
Read more