Skip to main content

COVID-19 Proves Our Schools Are Social Service Centers First, Education Institutions Second

There is no way the 180-day (or 1,080 hours) school year can be completed by the end of previously established school calendars for this year given the fact that spring break has now already been effectively extended an additional two weeks. One option would have been to extend the school year into the summer. Given the level of family togetherness being experienced now, and the fact that incomes are being lost and many would be interested in making up the losses, it’s not unreasonable to expect vacation plans to be radically remade or canceled anyway. Instead, Oklahoma’s State Board of Education precipitously closed the schools and did not call for an extension of end-of-school dates. Thus, the summer option has been foreclosed.

The State Board is within its rights. Oklahoma statutes (70 O.S. § 1-109 E) state, “A school district may maintain school for less than a full school year only when conditions beyond the control of school authorities make the maintenance of the term impossible and the State Board of Education has been apprised and has expressed concurrence in writing.”

So on March 25th, the State Board of Education effectively suspended school activities in school buildings for the rest of the year by closing school buildings. Emergency rules have been promulgated that mandate all school districts implement distance learning. Undoubtedly, this has brought about a good deal of frenetic, and very real, work activity in districts that had never planned for widespread distance learning, have no expertise in distance learning, and are in the unenviable position of having to start effectively from zero to get something up and running.

Nonetheless, an official State Department of Education document says “Districts are expected to continue providing learning opportunities for students through the end of the school year and thereby afford students the opportunity to earn grades.” That vague statement doesn’t mean anything like truly rigorous learning will occur. The fact is that a significant portion of the current school year is being lost. While distance learning has proved effective, this is true when the people implementing it have had time to get it right. The public schools, in an emergency, have not had that time. 

Teachers throughout the state would be introducing new material to students right now. New assignments to better cement content in students’ minds, and to assess their progress, would have been given. Some of the loss in learning can be made up next year. Much of the beginning of any school year is review, but graduating seniors have now had their last crucial year in high school cut short. And there is no denying that the suspension of school for over two months represents an educational setback in a state that really cannot afford any educational setbacks.

Meanwhile, schools continue to deliver meals. In fact, odds are that the hardest-working people at our schools right now are food preparers and those who are passing out the food. While it’s true that food is an absolute basic necessity while learning is not, it is also true that the survival of our civilization turns on education. 

As the philosopher/political theorist Hannah Arendt put it, “Every generation, civilization is invaded by barbarians – we call them ‘children’.” And as economist Thomas Sowell has put it, “Each new generation born is in effect an invasion of civilization by little barbarians, who must be civilized before it is too late.”

It is this mission, expressed so bluntly by Sowell, to civilize and educate each new generation, that the public school system was originally organized to accomplish. Given what we spend on them, they do not do it well, even when they aren’t being shut down by strikes and virus panics. But it seems they do a pretty good job of keeping the food mission open, no matter what. 

And this is the problem that the Wuhan virus has brought into stark relief. The public education system really should have only one mission – to educate kids – and should focus on that mission to the exclusion of all else. And if it were focused on that mission, perhaps the State Board would have extended school into the summer.

Instead, we have given public schools the mission of providing nutrition, the mission of providing transportation, the mission of providing mental health services, the mission of providing general health services, the mission of providing daycare (pre-K), and the mission of providing local entertainments. Public schools’ education mission has become secondary, at best, and it shows. So they’re still open to deliver meals, but they’re effectively closed to deliver educational content.

Byron Schlomach is Director of 1889 Institute. He can be contacted at

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the official position of 1889 Institute.

Popular posts from this blog

Friday Special: The Left’s New Fear of Speech

As we said there in rejecting Virginia's claim that the only way it could enable its citizens to find their self-interest was to deny them information that is neither false nor misleading: "There is… an alternative to this highly paternalistic approach. That alternative is to assume that this information is not in itself harmful, that people will perceive their own best interests if only they are well enough informed, and that the best means to that end is to open the channels of communication rather than to close them. - Thurgood Marshall, Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township Of Willingboro , 431 U.S. 85 (1977) With 2020 being such a caustic year, many novel innovations will be forgotten. Does anyone remember that the global shutdown was supposed to last three weeks to “flatten the curve?” The phrase probably rings a bell now that you hear it, but I bet you haven’t thought of it lately. We took for granted that something had to be done. We blithely accepted that lockdowns wer

OG&E and the Corporation Commission Aren’t Doing Their Jobs

At the time of this writing, it’s been a full week since there was power at my home. I live within OG&E’s electrical grid, so when it comes to being without power this past week, I’m nothing special. Many of OG&E’s customers had no power for days, and some will have no power for well over a week. By the time power is restored to everyone in their service area, OG&E’s own estimate is that it will have taken ten full days to repair all the damage from Oklahoma’s latest ice storm. Ice storms are bears, no doubt about it. They are very hard on trees, and if the roads ice over, they are very hard on cars. But roads, for the most part, were not an issue during Oklahoma’s “Icemageddon” of 2020. The problem was the extra weight of the ice on trees, wires and poles. And what we discovered was that Oklahoma’s electric power grid, once again, was not up to the challenge. Fact is, Oklahoma’s power grid isn’t up to much of Oklahoma’s weather. Every time the electricity goes out, which

Official Statement of 1889 Institute: Open Oklahoma’s Schools

Byron Schlomach, director of the 1889 Institute, issued the following statement today regarding the ongoing school closures throughout Oklahoma as a result of the Oklahoma State Board of Education’s response to the COVID-19 virus: Way back in March, the 1889 Institute first protested school closings based on then-existing evidence that school-age children are not prone to the disease, evidence confirmed in intervening months. This evidence, combined with the failure of school districts to provide a rigorous online education and the hardship on two-earner families created by distance learning, makes it clear that closing the schools has, indeed, been a policy error of epic proportions. To that end, 1889 Institute is calling on the Board of Education to rescind its current guidance that recommends such closures and reopen traditional brick and mortar schools immediately following the upcoming Christmas break. Not doing so is a disservice to both students and parents and will have a last

Think Carefully before Voting on SQ 802

So we vote next week on whether or not to expand Medicaid according to Obamacare’s provisions. A vote “Yes” on State Question 802 would expand Medicaid to able-bodied adults above the poverty line. A vote “No” would keep the status quo, with taxpayers buying health care under Medicaid mainly for poor children and pregnant mothers. But as with just about anything proposed by initiative, State Question 802 is not really that simple. For one thing, it forever entrenches a federal program, which can be changed by Congress at any time, in our state’s constitution, which is not so easily amended. Obviously, the proponents of SQ 802 want to set the terms of the Medicaid expansion permanently, sidestepping our constitutionally instituted legislature, which is supposed to react and adjust to existing circumstances. SQ 802 would take that flexibility away. A consequence of that reduced flexibility will likely be sacrifices in other state-financed programs such as public education, both in the n