Skip to main content

10 New Years Resolutions for Oklahoma


The new year brings with it the promise of new beginnings. A chance to reset. To do better. In that spirit, 1889 offers the following resolutions to policymakers across the state. 


1. Reduce occupational licensing
This originally read “End (or greatly reduce) occupational licensing,” but let’s be a little more realistic. If Oklahoma would even start moving the right direction (that is, shrinking the number of occupations for which a license is required, instead of growing it), it would be a huge win for the state. It would improve the overall economy. It would allow more people to find a job they are good at. Government rarely gets a shot at such an obvious win-win. 

2. Reduce the number of branches of government to a manageable number. 
We will follow John Adams’ lead and suggest only three – legislative, executive, and judiciary – and recommend getting rid of the TSET, the Corporation Commission, and the host of other independent agencies with unelected oversight in Oklahoma. Agencies with no accountability to the executive or the legislature end up forgetting they are ultimately accountable to voters and taxpayers. When they don’t have to convince the legislature to fund them every year, and don’t answer for their jobs to the governor, agencies run amok and pursue their own goals. 

3. Teach students to read.
As 1889 has previously written, the evidence shows that phonics works for (nearly) every student. Whole word instruction does not. 

4. Open up school choice for all. 
We know that competition brings out the best in businesses. Why should schools be any different? And why should state funding be used to prop up failing local school districts? Let parents decide what school is right for their kids - whether it’s their local public school, a school in a nearby district, charter, or private. 

5. Prioritize classrooms when creating school budgets.
Research shows that past a certain minimum funding threshold, additional education dollars do very little to improve education outcomes, unless they are properly directed. There does not need to be a separate non-teaching employee for every teacher. 

6. Encourage high school students to graduate with 60 hours of college credit through policy changes.
This is the lowest hanging fruit on this list. Between Advanced Placement, CLEP, and online schools offering dual enrollment, every interested student should be able to leave high school with an associate’s degree, saving two years of tuition and getting them into the work force two years earlier. 

7. Fix the courts.
We’ve written about this one a lot. It starts with selecting the right judges. This requires a better selection method, including public access to the process and the right selection criteria, such as a commitment to interpreting the law, not creating policy. 1889 Institute favors a selection method based on the federal method where the governor nominates and the senate confirms, with a single, long term - somewhere in the range of 18 - 20 years. 

8. Stop gambling on ways to bring the next big big thing to Oklahoma.
By the time plodding bureaucrats get the next big thing, developed elsewhere, to come here, its pinnacle has already passed. Instead, make the state welcoming to all businesses. Create low tax rates with a broad bases. Preferably, eliminate the work-discouraging income tax. Taxation discourages the taxed activity. Production is hard. Consumption is easy. Taxing consumption will interfere less in the free market - consumers are less likely to under-consume because consumption is easy. 

9. Reject Obamacare Medicaid expansion.
How could anyone look at the mess Obamacare has created in other states and in the national economy and say “Yes, I want more of THAT!”? 

10. Set measurable goals for outcomes when creating or renewing spending programs.
Assume for a minute that eventually we really do run out of other people’s money. Shouldn’t we prioritize spending programs that do what they’re supposed to? Isn’t a good way of knowing which programs work to attach measurable outcomes to the spending, and measure those outcomes year after year? And wouldn’t it make sense to kill programs that don’t work or don’t work well enough to justify their cost? 

Oklahoma, we can do better this year.

Mike Davis is Research Fellow at 1889 Institute. He can be reached at mdavis@1889institute.org.


Popular posts from this blog

Lies We Tell in Government, and Our Debts to Truth

HBO’s mini-series,  Chernobyl ,  is a drama depicting  the disastrous  1986  explosion ,  and  hero ic efforts to control the  resulting  meltdown ,  of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine  (then part of the Soviet Union ).  A flawed man, but true hero,  Valery  Alexeyvich   Legasov , worked tirelessly to ameliorate the disaster’s consequences and  chiefly  investigated its cause. He was  Deputy Director of the  Kurchatov  Institute of Atomic Energ y , a Soviet elite, who  is portrayed at the end of  the  series making a dramatic speech at a trial about how the nuclear reactor exploded, when  such an explosion in that type of reactor  should not have been possible. In the course of the series, the audience  learns  that the reactor had a design flaw that had been covered up by the Soviet State (true).  The audience also learns  that...
Read more

Present Reforms to Keep the Ghost of State Questions Past from Creating Future Headaches

Oklahoma, like many western states, allows its citizens to directly participate in the democratic process through citizen initiatives and referendums. In a referendum, the legislature directs a question to the people — usually to modify the state constitution, since the legislature can change statutes itself. An initiative requires no legislative involvement, but is initiated by the people via signature gathering, and can be used to modify statute or amend the constitution. Collectively, the initiatives and referendums that make it onto the ballot are known as State Questions.   Recently, there have been calls to make it more difficult to amend the constitution. At least two proposals are being discussed. One would diversify the signature requirement by demanding that a proportional amount of signatures come from each region of the state. The other would require a sixty percent majority to adopt a constitutional amendment rather than the fifty percent plus one currently in place. ...
Read more

Even If Pandemic Models Were Right, Were Covid Lockdowns Wrong?

1889 has been quite critical of pandemic modeling that government officials have relied on for their Covid-19 response. We have also criticized shutdown orders in light of flaws in the models. But let’s assume for a moment that the worst predictions really would have come true if nothing was done. Even in those worst case scenarios, it’s fair to ask if our governments did the right thing. Were involuntary shutdowns justified, or would people have found a way to both limit the contagion and maintain some level of productivity? Was putting healthy citizens under house arrest acceptable even if they were willing to risk infection?   While large groups of people are often compared to herd animals, we are not sheep. We don’t behave like animals. We can, have, and will step up when our communities are in danger. When government and journalists give incomplete or false information, people will act irrationally. Depending on the situation, some will blindly follow the first aut...
Read more

The Legislators in Black Robes Strike Again

Once again, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has usurped the Legislature’s constitutional authority. This time, it has legislated new election rules, behind closed doors, on a compressed timetable, and without public input. All with an election looming in which the new rules will apply. On Monday, the Court eliminated the requirement that citizens voting by absentee ballot have their identity verified by a notary. If left unaddressed by the Legislature, absentee voters will be permitted to vote with little more than a pinky-swear promise that they are who they say they are, while in-person voters will still be required to show ID at the polling place. The Court’s decision not only harms the integrity of our election process, but was arrived at through a highly unusual process. The legal challenge to the notarization requirement was launched by a coalition of progressive organizations calling themselves “Let the People Vote.” Their stated reasoning for allowing unverified voting is...
Read more